Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
714
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 20:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm not exactly jumping for joy over the suggestions here simply because I don't seriously believe PL would just dump the current rental empire model for the sake of the health of Eve.
Where were these radical ideas after the moon goo nerf? Where were these ideas after the Halloween War? I understand you are all so terribly bored you drop Supers on cruisers but honestly? I doubt you could convince people to give up easy income.
Rental income is the easiest thing in existence. Basically CFC/Nc./PL have become landlords nothing more. And due to botlord agreements for both sides to abstain from hurting each others rental space these ideas make even less sense.
Can you seriously convince these people to unclutch their pearls long enough to see there's more to Eve than a blinking walllet? I doubt it.
And what of PL's super cap force? There's just too many unanswered questions and even though the ideas are radical and refreshing, I doubt they will ever come to fruition.
CCP depends upon these once a year proxy wars to advertise 2000 man space battles to draw more people in. What these people don't understand is the 10% tidi, the billions of isk needed to field huge behemoths let alone the years to train such ships too.
So it's a catch 22. You either revert Eve back to an even more niche game and lose half the subscribers or you let the coalitions become so bloated and fat that the line members eventually bleed off and you lose those people anyway.
These are fresh ideas but hardly practical and certainly laughable when leaders of entities like yours scoff at anything that would hurt their easy income. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
715
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 21:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Wentworth III wrote:Tara Read wrote:I'm not exactly jumping for joy over the suggestions here simply because I don't seriously believe PL would just dump the current rental empire model for the sake of the health of Eve.
Where were these radical ideas after the moon goo nerf? Where were these ideas after the Halloween War? I understand you are all so terribly bored you drop Supers on cruisers but honestly? I doubt you could convince people to give up easy income.
Rental income is the easiest thing in existence. Basically CFC/Nc./PL have become landlords nothing more. And due to botlord agreements for both sides to abstain from hurting each others rental space these ideas make even less sense.
Can you seriously convince these people to unclutch their pearls long enough to see there's more to Eve than a blinking walllet? I doubt it.
And what of PL's super cap force? There's just too many unanswered questions and even though the ideas are radical and refreshing, I doubt they will ever come to fruition.
CCP depends upon these once a year proxy wars to advertise 2000 man space battles to draw more people in. What these people don't understand is the 10% tidi, the billions of isk needed to field huge behemoths let alone the years to train such ships too.
So it's a catch 22. You either revert Eve back to an even more niche game and lose half the subscribers or you let the coalitions become so bloated and fat that the line members eventually bleed off and you lose those people anyway.
These are fresh ideas but hardly practical and certainly laughable when leaders of entities like yours scoff at anything that would hurt their easy income. Reading the first two lines of your post I'm not convinced you read the original message. The whole point of the proposed changes is to make entities like PL and NC. (and the CFC but I'm too sold on them) incapable of defending these vast renter holdings from coordinated attacks. PL wouldn't have the choice of dumping the rental empire, the idea is it would have to dump the rental empire (or at least give up a large part of it) as soon as it got attacked on multiple fronts.
I understand the rental empire model would be scrapped. My only qualm is how in the hell are you going to convince people who are used to easy isk and pretty much owning vast swathes of sov to give it up?
I'm actually pretty open to anything that breaks up the monotony null sec has mired itself in including Manfreds ideas. I remember the Great War, BoB, conflicts of a regional nature Manfred spoke of.
I even remember the little headlines you'd get as you log in declaring a Titan was destroyed. You know back when Titans were big news.
There's another glaring question as well in regards to force projection. What happens to these dozens of now unusable Supers? Because pretty much a capital becomes a lumbering giant able to use gates but like the battleship fleets of old cumbersome.
Again great brainstorming but in order for these ideas to work they need tweaking and for CCP to get off their assets and realize the very game they created is too small for the current player base and power projection mechanics. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
715
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 21:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:Tara Read wrote:I'm not exactly jumping for joy over the suggestions here simply because I don't seriously believe PL would just dump the current rental empire model for the sake of the health of Eve.
Where were these radical ideas after the moon goo nerf? Where were these ideas after the Halloween War? I understand you are all so terribly bored you drop Supers on cruisers but honestly? I doubt you could convince people to give up easy income.
Rental income is the easiest thing in existence. Basically CFC/Nc./PL have become landlords nothing more. And due to botlord agreements for both sides to abstain from hurting each others rental space these ideas make even less sense.
Can you seriously convince these people to unclutch their pearls long enough to see there's more to Eve than a blinking walllet? I doubt it.
And what of PL's super cap force? There's just too many unanswered questions and even though the ideas are radical and refreshing, I doubt they will ever come to fruition.
CCP depends upon these once a year proxy wars to advertise 2000 man space battles to draw more people in. What these people don't understand is the 10% tidi, the billions of isk needed to field huge behemoths let alone the years to train such ships too.
So it's a catch 22. You either revert Eve back to an even more niche game and lose half the subscribers or you let the coalitions become so bloated and fat that the line members eventually bleed off and you lose those people anyway.
These are fresh ideas but hardly practical and certainly laughable when leaders of entities like yours scoff at anything that would hurt their easy income. PL has been through times where we were scraping along on the bones of our arses. The vast majority of PL pilots are PvPers first and foremost. If it meant we got to go back to our old way of life, living out of NPC stations and taking contracts on people, fighting against 100 man fleets instead of 1000 man fleets, PL would take it. If, by then, there were good fights to be had, then people would quickly get bored of dropping no risk supers on everything and go back to flying conventional ships and just having fun. A lot of people would take a hit, but I doubt any of them would mind if it meant we got to go back to what we were doing when eve was not about how much you can bring to a fight. It's probably hard to believe, and you're right, if supers stay as they are now, you will always get bored PL members dropping them on people. That's why they need nerfing.
It seems we are of the same mindset then. I gotta say I certainly smiled reading a response I was hoping to get. Content over anything else. And isn't that a shame though? That people put profit over content, fights are secondary instead of a focus?
Man the game has shifted terribly these last few years. Eve has just outgrown itself in some regards.
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
715
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 21:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:Tara Read wrote:Wentworth III wrote:Tara Read wrote:I'm not exactly jumping for joy over the suggestions here simply because I don't seriously believe PL would just dump the current rental empire model for the sake of the health of Eve.
Where were these radical ideas after the moon goo nerf? Where were these ideas after the Halloween War? I understand you are all so terribly bored you drop Supers on cruisers but honestly? I doubt you could convince people to give up easy income.
Rental income is the easiest thing in existence. Basically CFC/Nc./PL have become landlords nothing more. And due to botlord agreements for both sides to abstain from hurting each others rental space these ideas make even less sense.
Can you seriously convince these people to unclutch their pearls long enough to see there's more to Eve than a blinking walllet? I doubt it.
And what of PL's super cap force? There's just too many unanswered questions and even though the ideas are radical and refreshing, I doubt they will ever come to fruition.
CCP depends upon these once a year proxy wars to advertise 2000 man space battles to draw more people in. What these people don't understand is the 10% tidi, the billions of isk needed to field huge behemoths let alone the years to train such ships too.
So it's a catch 22. You either revert Eve back to an even more niche game and lose half the subscribers or you let the coalitions become so bloated and fat that the line members eventually bleed off and you lose those people anyway.
These are fresh ideas but hardly practical and certainly laughable when leaders of entities like yours scoff at anything that would hurt their easy income. Reading the first two lines of your post I'm not convinced you read the original message. The whole point of the proposed changes is to make entities like PL and NC. (and the CFC but I'm too sold on them) incapable of defending these vast renter holdings from coordinated attacks. PL wouldn't have the choice of dumping the rental empire, the idea is it would have to dump the rental empire (or at least give up a large part of it) as soon as it got attacked on multiple fronts. I understand the rental empire model would be scrapped. My only qualm is how in the hell are you going to convince people who are used to easy isk and pretty much owning vast swathes of sov to give it up? I'm actually pretty open to anything that breaks up the monotony null sec has mired itself in including Manfreds ideas. I remember the Great War, BoB, conflicts of a regional nature Manfred spoke of. I even remember the little headlines you'd get as you log in declaring a Titan was destroyed. You know back when Titans were big news. There's another glaring question as well in regards to force projection. What happens to these dozens of now unusable Supers? Because pretty much a capital becomes a lumbering giant able to use gates but like the battleship fleets of old cumbersome. Again great brainstorming but in order for these ideas to work they need tweaking and for CCP to get off their asses and realize the very game they created is too small for the current player base and power projection mechanics. Supers are goddamn boring and if we were to get rid of supers altogether I don't think many tears would be shed tbh. The only reason WE have them is because other people have them and the only reason other people have them is because we have them.
My analogy of Supers being Eve's ICBM was correct then. They seem to be more of a deterrent than anything else. If you could get seriously backing in PL for Manfreds ideas there would be some weight to it. Not that Manfred himself isn't weight enough behind them.
You got my support on this. Gate camping shipping lanes? Holy **** it's almost like Piracy would be profitable again!
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
715
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 21:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Manfred Sideous wrote:Tara Read wrote:I'm not exactly jumping for joy over the suggestions here simply because I don't seriously believe PL would just dump the current rental empire model for the sake of the health of Eve.
Where were these radical ideas after the moon goo nerf? Where were these ideas after the Halloween War? I understand you are all so terribly bored you drop Supers on cruisers but honestly? I doubt you could convince people to give up easy income.
Rental income is the easiest thing in existence. Basically CFC/Nc./PL have become landlords nothing more. And due to botlord agreements for both sides to abstain from hurting each others rental space these ideas make even less sense.
Can you seriously convince these people to unclutch their pearls long enough to see there's more to Eve than a blinking walllet? I doubt it.
And what of PL's super cap force? There's just too many unanswered questions and even though the ideas are radical and refreshing, I doubt they will ever come to fruition.
CCP depends upon these once a year proxy wars to advertise 2000 man space battles to draw more people in. What these people don't understand is the 10% tidi, the billions of isk needed to field huge behemoths let alone the years to train such ships too.
So it's a catch 22. You either revert Eve back to an even more niche game and lose half the subscribers or you let the coalitions become so bloated and fat that the line members eventually bleed off and you lose those people anyway.
These are fresh ideas but hardly practical and certainly laughable when leaders of entities like yours scoff at anything that would hurt their easy income. Let me first just say I am but one man. I do not encompass the decision making for PL or CCP. I can tell you PL has weathered many changes in the game and been fine. I am sure we can weather more. We play as a team and strive for excellence. Ultimately I would like to think that EVERYONE wants a healthier Eve. One that continues to grow and is around for a very long time. I personally and willing to unclutch these so called "pearls" for that endstate. I think it would be exciting to see a more vibrant nullsec one where new groups can come out and carve themselves out a piece. I still think we would still see massive headline making fights. But I also think that not every fight will be a %10 Tidifest that we have now. I think the blocks will break up and the ones that refuse will atrophy from lack of content. There members will become disengaged. Groups like PL would have to change drastically we would either have to live in our sov to protect the rental space around it ( this limits us from being the boogeyman elsewhere) or we become the nomadic mercenary ( which means we can be the boogeyman anywhere but not at the same time).
You gotta look at it from an outside opinion Manfred. It is very uncouth for someone to just give it all up for the sake of the good of everyone else. And maybe that's exactly what Eve needs.
We've been shouted at from mountains by CCP and others "Greed Is Good!" But in the process the very heart and soul of this little universe we call New Eden has suffered altogether at the sake of isk and risk aversion.
To be honest I wish your ideas would be instantaneous. Regional conflicts, Pirate raids on shipping convoys, gate camps locking down pipes, local wars making Sov more of a small gang and intimate experience.
I mean Eve is and always should be about the experience. The fight. There's nothing quite like skilled pvp going toe to toe out scrapping and fighting tooth and nail. It's almost like people have forgotten these fights exist.
Let's do it. Let's make Eve content and pvp something worthy again. Difficult, skill based. Not on the number of Supers you can drop, or how many lemmings can cram into a system.
And for all of you blathering about logistics being hard go talk to some of the grey beards who did it back in the day. Hell Industry would have a valued place again in Eve too.
These changes are needed desperately. If not more pilots will become bored, more will unsub, more will not even look back and then all that isk will be utterly worthless and the only people who will play are the vets desperate for the old days and renters who know nothing else.
Let's make Eve great again guys. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
716
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 21:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Manfred Sideous wrote:Tara Read wrote:
My analogy of Supers being Eve's ICBM was correct then. They seem to be more of a deterrent than anything else. If you could get seriously backing in PL for Manfreds ideas there would be some weight to it. Not that Manfred himself isn't weight enough behind them.
You got my support on this. Gate camping shipping lanes? Holy **** it's almost like Piracy would be profitable again!
You saying im Fat bro ? Thats it Fite me now!
No cyno's at top belt? Fine : P And no you aren't fat. I'm the fat American riding a power scooter lol.
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
718
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 22:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:As a result, even if you have resisted joining a coalition, any war you get into can rapidly escalate to one with a coalition on the other side and you simply must be friendly with their enemy to survive. Most stupid responses to bipolar eve just tell people to have less blues. Idiots who follow this advice end up like TEST. You may not like coalitions, but you'll learn to live with them or you'll learn to live in highsec in the current system.
And this paragraph essentially sums up the state of Null Sec from politics, to power projection and sov. This game is no longer about staking your own claim in a violent universe, it's now about joining two sides or being eaten alive.
Ironically the highest posts objecting to Manfreds ideas are members of the CFC. Which really should come at no surprise. TEST may have died but for all their blathering at least they broke away and did things away from the HBC.
What I find particularly offensive is that those of us who pay for our own subscription? For those of us who log in we need to in your own words "live with" coalitions or go to highsec. I actually do neither and laugh at your assumption that any of us give a crap about 1000 man blobs.
Your idea of Eve and our idea of Eve is entirely different and why these changes need to take place. People need to stop hiding behind numbers and Supers and actually play the game.
You need to play the game. Or does my post offend you? The CFC needs to die. The NC as well need to die. Or this game will die. It's already started. Yesterday the CFC formed a 1000 man blob to fight against BL's 100.
When BL logged your members raged including Blarf. How dare we deny your 1000 people content? You don't get it do you? There's too many fish in this ever shrinking blue sea.
And eventually when your line members unsub and become bored maybe then it will make sense. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
718
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 22:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Tara Read wrote:Ironically the highest posts objecting to Manfreds ideas are members of the CFC. Which really should come at no surprise. TEST may have died but for all their blathering at least they broke away and did things away from the HBC. ... When BL logged your members raged including Blarf. How dare we deny your 1000 people content? You don't get it do you? There's too many fish in this ever shrinking blue sea.
TEST died because they're morons. They got the full backing of the N3 coalition despite their idioticy - they just had to cede an entire region to get it. They just lost anyway because they were irredeemable morons. You've got to love that every offensive N3 managed while Goonswarm was cocking up the initial phases of the war ground to a halt without us lifting a finger because TEST didn't notice the altcorp we had in their alliance despite months of SBUs vanishing, and that was just one of the many hilarious TEST cockups. As to the second thing, I don't know what nonsense you're referring to but it assuredly didn't happen. More to the point, your entire post is emblematic of the biggest mistake people make discussing the survival issue. EVE's gameplay forces coalitions. You cannot solve it by whining about hostile coalition lords: they're coalition lords because that's the only way to win. People who won't play the game get thrown out by people who will. You can't solve the problem by bitching about the bad people who are winning the current game because if you take them out they'll just be replaced by new people willing to play the game as it is instead of how you want it to be. Evolution is a ***** when it's selecting for something you don't want.
When did I ever mention Mittani or Progod? They are only faces to entities that are larger than anything Eve's creators could have envisioned 10 years ago.
Evolution is very basic. Evolving. Changing. Morphing into something that benefits the entity. Except these coalitions aren't evolving they are stagnating! Your line members are clamoring for something so bad that now the major power players have gone to Provi for even scraps of pvp.
And you assume that should these changes take place another coalition will rear it's ugly head to take as much sov as the CFC holds now? This is what the discussion is about.
How to prevent and avoid the sort of bloated stagnation your coalition now provides as "content" to thousands of players. And this is what the average null player cannot grasp. Do you know how many people apply to low sec Alliance's desperate for fights?
Do you know how many people have flowed back to low sec because they are utterly sick of the same tired bullshit being wrought about the "next" good war? People want content. They want conflict.
What good is isk if you can't use it? This is the dilemma groups like PL are facing now. Sure you got a Super, a Titan, and isk out the ass but no one to fight?
Therein lies the fundamental problem Manfred is trying to solve. You can't provide content when you outlaw conflict.
Here is the root of the problems now facing Null Sec. It Is BOTH mechanic and player driven based. How we fix these issues require drastic changes. If you truly want a vibrant Eve you can't just have two sides making fake wars while getting rich with no effort. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
719
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 03:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
So far there has been some very good points made. I think aside from those who want Eve to remain comfortable and dull all of us can agree upon a few things:
1. Power Projection needs to be severely limited and localized.
2. JF's need to be limited as well so that markets and industry is local as well.
3. Sov itself needs to provide bonuses and incentives for local groups to fight and maintain it.
4. Supers need to be limited in range and useage.
5. Sov mechanics ie. Structure grinding is ******** and needs to be reworked into something non supercap based.
Just some final thoughts on this. I really think that the idea of regional conflict, growth etc is truly what Eve is meant to be. Throughout the lore based history of New Eden humanity has been forced to deal with harsh realities and conflict.
There needs to be a sense of accomplishment. A sense of risk and even fear. Eve needs to be this wide eyed universe again that captivated players since it's creation in 2003.
Eve is not an easy game. It's not meant to be. There is no "win" except in that journey we all experience be it good fights, good friends, stories we can tell that no other community can experience.
Eve needs to be unique again. Null needs to be this mystical harsh place whispered about fought with peril and riches beyond a capsuleers wildest dreams.
You want to be the top dog? You want to truly be masters of your own house? Building and creating? Conquering and pillaging? Prove it.
Prove to all of New Eden that you are just as valuable in a fleet of 10, 20, 50, 100 as you are in a tidi ridden blob of 1000. I for one am excited and even giddy at the prospects of Eve having new life breathed into it. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
719
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 03:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Quote:2. JF's need to be limited as well so that markets and industry is local as well. To be fair this isn't strictly true. What's necessary for markets and industry to be local is for the means of production and resource acquisition to be up to the task. Crius is a good start in the production category, at least to the point where GSF will probably supply most of our fleets with ships and equipment built locally, because the cost advantage of doing so (even without factoring in not having to import the hulls) will be considerable. Much of the minerals to do that will still come from empire though, because things are still lacking in the resource acquisition department. Limiting JFs and similar logistics may give more room to make more radical changes in those regards, but it's not necessary.
To be fair and I understand your point the JF pretty much killed off Low Sec Piracy in the form of neutering trade routes that were vital supply chains to Null Sec systems.
Limiting it's usage would make local trade and industry more important especially mining fleets, ship production, etc. If you really want people to feel the burn limit supplies and especially the means in which to transport them.
Think in terms of the collapsing of the Eve Gate which gave birth to this universe. Cut off or at least limit an entities ability to import resources and you either live off the land or die.
And let's be honest here. Miners, Industrialists, all the people that build and create need to be worth their salt and will be if such changes are implemented.
I remember an entity from long ago called M0o who camped a vital trade route system called Mara, effectively forcing CCP themselves to step in and thus Concord was created!
Trade routes need to be vital again to spur conflict, increase risk, make logistics truly challenging and worth while. Plus a little ransom to a freighter full of goodies never hurt... Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
719
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 03:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
To Mynna silly quote limiting.
Well as for the "about it" portion killing off local low sec Pirates to those of us it was our bread and butter. But enough of that. Jump Drive logistics in general need to be reworked not just the JF so we can agree on that.
Also am I the only one who remembers M0o? I'm waxing nostalgic but think of the explosions and the prey again if Pirates and other merc groups tried to prey upon Null logistical protection fleets.
Ah it almost sounds too good to be true...
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
720
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 03:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tara Read wrote: I remember an entity from long ago called M0o who camped a vital trade route system called Mara, effectively forcing CCP themselves to step in and they in turn also died. Thus Concord was created!
Lol wow. That is some Oklahoma level ignorance you have got going. Here, let me help you. m0o did not, in fact, defeat CCP. https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/M0o#Developer_InteractionThat took me about forty seconds to look up by the way.
Bah I cocked up and redited the post. I thought originally that CCP tried to fight them several times before and had lost. Actually it's quite funny reading about them running away or being sent into other systems to break up the gatecamp.
Apologies on my Oklahoma level of ignorance. Sometimes my cousins just look that good : P
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
720
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 04:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tara Read wrote:To Mynna silly quote limiting.
Well as for the "about it" portion killing off local low sec Pirates to those of us it was our bread and butter. But enough of that. Jump Drive logistics in general need to be reworked not just the JF so we can agree on that.
Also am I the only one who remembers M0o? I'm waxing nostalgic but think of the explosions and the prey again if Pirates and other merc groups tried to prey upon Null logistical protection fleets.
Ah it almost sounds too good to be true...
I hadn't played at the time, but their exploits were one of the reasons I joined. Personally, although I do realize that Jump Freighters took a bite out of lowsec traffic, if it hadn't been that, it would have been a bunch of other things eventually. What's wrong with lowsec right now can't just be chalked up to one mechanic. Same thing with nullsec. People who gnash their teeth about Power Projection and drumbeat about taking it away are failing to see the bigger picture.
To be fair there are a myriad of issues both mechanic and player driven that have lead to the issues we are dealing with now. Hopefully though solutions can be found and more importantly implemented.
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |

Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
720
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 04:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tara Read wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tara Read wrote: I remember an entity from long ago called M0o who camped a vital trade route system called Mara, effectively forcing CCP themselves to step in and they in turn also died. Thus Concord was created!
Lol wow. That is some Oklahoma level ignorance you have got going. Here, let me help you. m0o did not, in fact, defeat CCP. https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/M0o#Developer_InteractionThat took me about forty seconds to look up by the way. Bah I cocked up and redited the post. I thought originally that CCP tried to fight them several times before and had lost. Actually it's quite funny reading about them running away or being sent into other systems to break up the gatecamp. Apologies on my Oklahoma level of ignorance. Sometimes my cousins just look that good : P Yeah, that was a bit more harsh than I intended, I just got done talking to my in laws for two hours. >.< But yeah, m0o actually cut and ran when the developer ships showed up, except one guy who got one shotted.
I also think alot of them ended up getting banned right? I still remember that video from Tank CEO bringing this mining thorax that was killed onto their comms and the guy flipping ****. Hilarious. Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org |
|
|